<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It’s time for the Liberal Democrats to devolve power to Nick Clegg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northumbrian.org.uk/nick-clegg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northumbrian.org.uk/nick-clegg/</link>
	<description>adventitious comms, tech, and music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:47:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.northumbrian.org.uk/nick-clegg/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northumbrian.org.uk/?p=173#comment-73</guid>
		<description>What this conference has taught us is not that the party is ill-disciplined but that the leadership is.  Leaving aside the fact that it is too late for even more centralisation before the general election, if I were in a position to change things I would be arguing for winding up the centralisation of the past year, not going up a gear.

If Nick wants command, he has to earn it.  He didn&#039;t get elected pledging to tear up the party&#039;s internal democracy and he got a tiny mandate.  Playing stunts like briefing against his own policy committee after managing to agree a carefully worded compromise is simply childish. And the idea that Cable&#039;s mansion tax would have been more thought through if only he had consulted LESS people about it is Alice in Wonderland stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this conference has taught us is not that the party is ill-disciplined but that the leadership is.  Leaving aside the fact that it is too late for even more centralisation before the general election, if I were in a position to change things I would be arguing for winding up the centralisation of the past year, not going up a gear.</p>
<p>If Nick wants command, he has to earn it.  He didn&#8217;t get elected pledging to tear up the party&#8217;s internal democracy and he got a tiny mandate.  Playing stunts like briefing against his own policy committee after managing to agree a carefully worded compromise is simply childish. And the idea that Cable&#8217;s mansion tax would have been more thought through if only he had consulted LESS people about it is Alice in Wonderland stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennie</title>
		<link>http://www.northumbrian.org.uk/nick-clegg/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northumbrian.org.uk/?p=173#comment-72</guid>
		<description>The only one of those I would support would be the ability to discipline MPs/MSPs.

The idea that the leader determines the running order of conference, and can make policy of his/her own bat? No. No way. If we&#039;re not a democratic party, we are NOTHING.

Thanks for the linkies, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only one of those I would support would be the ability to discipline MPs/MSPs.</p>
<p>The idea that the leader determines the running order of conference, and can make policy of his/her own bat? No. No way. If we&#8217;re not a democratic party, we are NOTHING.</p>
<p>Thanks for the linkies, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
